Data tagging and labeling assists with the useability, discoverability and analysis of data. (Getty Images)

The Pentagon’s zero-trust office is on a mission to develop and test a plan for organizing its reams of data by the end of the year.

At the TechNet Cyber conference presented by the Armed Forces Communications & Electronics Association International in Baltimore last month, Randy Resnick, director of the Zero Trust Portfolio Management Office, said tagging and labeling, the practice of assigning metadata and identifiers to pieces of data, has been a long-term challenge for the department.

“They’ve been apparently working on this for 12 or more years —15 years — and I think it’s time enough to do something,” he said.

By way of an update on these efforts, Resnick said he approved three pilot programs in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Defense Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Office and the Department of Homeland Security to develop a plan that would allow for all the necessary conversions and interpretations to process any data tagging and labeling standard in an understandable, repeatable way.

The goal is to have a successful demo of a schema by the end of the calendar year. Resnick also set a deadline of October for an internal working group to brief his office on a solution, even a partial one.

“We’re not looking for perfection,” he said at TechNet. “We have to start implementing something, and then it’ll grow over time as people agree to more tags and more labels. It’s got to be flexible enough to allow for growth.”

In a January study by Defense Innovation Board, researchers found “data access remains the central enterprise-level obstacle to the sharing and use of data for the warfighter.” Part of that is because military departments are “haphazardly” placing data leaders throughout the organization while top-level tech leaders are struggling to enforce their position as a unifier. Other persistent issues like a lack of uniform guidance, sustained funding, workforce gaps and technical silos also make progress on broader zero-trust difficult.

For now, there remain roadblocks that separate the DoD from the data economy it wants, but Resnick is realistic about these challenges and said a solution in development is better than nothing at all.

“That’s the type of solution that I personally am looking for, because that’s what the department needs,” he said.

 

https://www.defensenews.com/cyber/2024/07/08/pentagon-zero-trust-office-aims-to-start-data-tagging-labeling-in-24/

Molly Weisner is a staff reporter for Federal Times where she covers labor, policy and contracting pertaining to the government workforce. She made previous stops at USA Today and McClatchy as a digital producer, and worked at The New York Times as a copy editor. Molly majored in journalism at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Flexibility and adaptivity are key components of the nationwide push to expand broadband access across the country, as the Department of Commerce seeks to understand which geographical regions need to be prioritized, Secretary Gina Raimondo said during a hearing before the Senate Appropriations Committee on Tuesday.

Several lawmakers, including Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, D-NH; Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska; and Patrick Leahy, D-Vt, inquired about the accuracy of broadband accessibility and coverage maps designed by the Federal Communication Commission. These maps will inform Commerce which areas of the country need broadband infrastructure the most.

The FCC’s coverage maps have caught criticism before, with Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, calling them “woefully inadequate.”

Raimondo said that these maps will be pivotal to broadband installations, and that Commerce will be using data from the census to get a better idea of individual household needs.

“I do have confidence they will be, you know, more accurate than in the past,” Raimondo said.

Pending the completion and finalization of these maps, Raimondo explained that Commerce intends to launch a notice of funding opportunity around May 16. From there, states must submit individual letters of intent, and, upon federal approval, be awarded $5 million in planning funding for technical assistance.

Raimondo recommended that states jumpstart their individual plans for broadband deployment soon to get an accurate assessment of current coverage.

Raimondo explained the current timeline that Commerce is working with as it begins to roll out broadband access is focused on engaging with state needs to determine the challenges associated with installing new infrastructure, and tailor projects with their needs in mind.

“The way we are administering this program is with great flexibility,” she said. “If I deliver no other message today, I want to be clear…we do not have a one size fits all approach. Because I don’t believe that would be successful.”

Exactly which communities will first receive the initial broadband infrastructure rollouts was also a topic of discussion during the hearing. Raimondo confirmed that pursuant to the Biden’s Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, her administration is prioritizing unserved communities over underserved communities––that is, delivering broadband access to communities shown to be without broadband access and next, awarding funding to communities with limited access.

Murkowski brought up the pressing need for better broadband infrastructure on Native American tribal lands––something the Biden administration has focused on improving.

Raimondo said that efforts to deploy broadband in tribal regions are running behind schedule, but it remains a priority for the department. She emphasized that many broadband proposals received by Native American communities have needed to be augmented.

“We want to give the tribes a chance to get the money, which means you have to help them improve their proposals,” she said.

Tribal advocates and leadership previously brought up the difficulties some communities have in accessing federal funding help––often due to the lack of internet access in the first place.

“We’ve learned that you have to really do stakeholder engagement, because the needs and conditions in tribes are just different,” Raimondo added. “And so we have to get out in front of it and listen even more.”

Federal nuclear regulators want external researchers to demonstrate how artificial intelligence and machine learning can pinpoint cyberattacks against the nation’s nuclear power plants.

“To prepare to regulate nuclear applications of AI/ML, the [Nuclear Regulatory Commission] plans to conduct research activities to develop insights and fundamental knowledge about AI/ML and the AI/ML use case,” NRC officials wrote in a recent federal contracting notice.

This request comes almost a year since the commission asked for feedback regarding how AI and ML technologies are used in nuclear power operations—and will be used down the line.

For this latest work, the NRC wants to collaborate with an entity that can provide existing personnel, equipment and facilities to implement a test case for full assessment.

“The research conducted by the vendor is expected to produce data that evaluates the impacts of AI/ML concepts, technologies and applications on nuclear power cybersecurity outcomes and programs, especially those outcomes and programs that may be relevant to new and advanced reactor designs,” officials wrote.

A technical report documenting outcomes will be produced from the effort.

NRC noted that potential partners must have a range of capabilities to meet their criteria, including assets to simulate nuclear power plants and cyberattacks on them, resources to complete the work in 16 months and more.

“If the vendor cannot demonstrate the level of formal training or experience specified above, they may submit a plan for how they will acquire the required training and experience,” officials wrote.